- Reaction score
- 620
Yes it can
Don't waste your time, they will laugh at your face.Strong denial of these users about potential risks of reducing an essential sexual body hormone
Do we have any scientific studies proving this effect?
Yes it can
Don't waste your time, they will laugh at your face.Strong denial of these users about potential risks of reducing an essential sexual body hormone
Finasteride CAN lead to penile shrinkage due to damage to the prudential nerve.
I saw on another post that you took finasteride for more than 10 years, did you get side effects right away or they built up over the years? Do you still take it?
wtf is a "prudential" nerve??
I think what you meant to say is "pudendal nerve" and idk how DHT has to do ANYTHING with a pudendal nerve.... this is literally like saying finasteride causes broken arms lol
DHT is involved in penile tissue, no broscience here, true biologic fact
Ok, now please give me a correlation between the Pudendal nerve and dht, cause as far as I know, there's none. I'm not talking about penile tissue; I'm talking about pudendal nerve specifically; as that's thenclaim that was made.
Don't know about that.
But this is relevant in this thread, because you can cause permanent pudendal nerve damages by doing such doubtful penis exercices, even cyclists can have impotence just by riding too much their bike
Don't disagree with that at all, my point was pudendal nerve damage is usually a result of a physical accident, has nothing to do with hormones.
We all know dht is found in our balls and genital tissue, the main reason we're ok with suppressing it is we're told these hormones are crucial at developing and growing our genitals, not maintaining. Is it true? Who the f*** knows anymore, but a lot of stuff happens to your body in 10 years especially after 25 man, it can be a factor to your issues but you can't conclude it being the culprit
The question is: this amount of penile caverNOUSHOMETHINGLIKETHAT reduction have impact in the quality of erection ? Apparently the study suggests it doesnthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375859
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12647000
This is hard to track on humans, no one wants to have his junk looked at, measured, weighted and biopsied for many years just for science
I bet Merck didn't anyway
The question is: this amount of penile caverNOUSHOMETHINGLIKETHAT reduction have impact in the quality of erection ? Apparently the study suggests it doesnt
The question is: this amount of penile caverNOUSHOMETHINGLIKETHAT reduction have impact in the quality of erection ? Apparently the study suggests it doesnt