You're lying. Show me ONE source of reporting on any subject from either the 2014 or 2015 hair congress that me and Desmond84 attended either at all or within a respectable timeframe after those congresses.
Not sure what you're trying to prove.
Show me once source that was a
big deal from either of those conferences.
I have already proved my point.
If information is not leaving those conferences, it's because the people bringing it know that it is not something of significance to anyone outside of the circle that would specifically attend the conference.
If you have some ground-breaking cancer research, skin regeneration therapy, etc. do you hang on to it until some conference to share it?
Nope. Again,
nobody does this. Not RepliCel, not Cotsarelis on the scarless healing research, not Tsuji and his discoveries, not Riken and Kyocera's deal, not PolairtyTE, not L'Oreal, not Samumed, not any company in the pipeline or in any other area of medicine.
Nobody does this.
They publish their findings for peer review, inform investors and issue a press release if it is worth discussing — they either keep what they've got on a strict, need-to-know basis like Follica is doing or they just come out and say what's happening.
The kind of info one is likely to get from attending such a conference is esoteric knowledge that appeals to guys like InBeforeTheCure and Swoop. Most people here and everywhere else just want to know "is the cure coming and what's the release date?"
and you bet your boots they will find out about that and again, all the major breakthroughs thus far have not been kept wrapped up like a Christmas present we only get to open at a hairloss conference.
P.S.
I'm not against you going or saying it's a total waste of time, but I think it's extremely unlikely you're going to get anything earth-shattering and it's an objectively false claim that pertinent information isn't actively reported on by the media and unveiled by companies themselves.
We've been talking about it for a year, steady.