Money only matters when you make enough. If you think raking in 40-60,000 annually will make a substantial difference then you're highly delusional.
When you're making 150k + then we'll talk about the importance of money helping you get laid.
....I dont even understand this whole money concept tbh. I make over 100,000 and it doesn't make any difference within my sex life.
Most guys can't chose to be tall, so thats out of the question. Being fit is definitely doable. And a requirement like being an athlete is ridiculous. However, these three things are demanded of women.
Have you seen this sh!t?
[video=youtube;-QwUWgxjee0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QwUWgxjee0[/video]
A preference that the man will never be able to change. Like "sucks that you're bald, now you'll never have me!" while there would have been no problem if the guy was NW1.
Remember that the vast majority think like that for no good reason, I explained it before, it's like the height factor, they say they want a tall guy because other girls say it all the time.
It's not a preference, it's hating, they want to put us down and make us feel bad, because we don't meet their collectively-fabricated criteria. Women and NW1 men get a kick out of it.
In the end, it's about power, men who don't have hair are inferior to the full heads. Women and NW1 will make sure to remind us of that fact whenever they get the chance.
If the media starts telling girls bald men are sexy all the time, if they cast bald actors were cast for Christian Grey type roles or in their vampire movies, then women would start creaming their panties over bald men, I would bet my life on it.
Because women are that weak-minded, they will believe anything the media tell them to believe. Despite all the self-hate that could be seen in my posts when I was bald, I will say it again: bald men are not fundamentally ugly, and women could fall in love with a bald man with no problem.
But if the mainstream media and the TV shows they watch show them that it should not be that way, then it won't be for them. "No bald men sorry! I want to live the same romances as the girls in Grey's Anatomy! And in Grey's Anatomy, the guys they chose to date all had hair so..."
If the media starts telling girls bald men are sexy all the time, if they cast bald actors were cast for Christian Grey type roles or in their vampire movies, then women would start creaming their panties over bald men, I would bet my life on it.
Because women are that weak-minded, they will believe anything the media tell them to believe. Despite all the self-hate that could be seen in my posts when I was bald, I will say it again: bald men are not fundamentally ugly, and women could fall in love with a bald man with no problem.
But if the mainstream media and the TV shows they watch show them that it should not be that way, then it won't be for them. "No bald men sorry! I want to live the same romances as the girls in Grey's Anatomy! And in Grey's Anatomy, the guys they chose to date all had hair so..."
I'll have to disagree here Fred. I appreciate your angle. Yes we all have our types, but then you hear people "say he/she is hot but not my type." That shows we appreciate attraction universally.
I don't think women would fall for it. Do you think if media showed bald women 24/7 men would suddenly like them more? Baldness does make most people lost points in the looks department, in fact even things like scars, asymmetrical face have their charm but losing your hair, not so. For the majority of us anyway.
Even before media became big, women were loving men who are tall, good looking, full hair e.t.c. It's only natural and this all happened centuries ago. The reason baldness didn't become extinct is because there are multiple genes involved and it's quite widespread. Also if you go back to when humans first came on the scene, survival and reproduction was more important. Later there was more emphasis on attraction I imagine when we understood our world better - that's when bald men probably felt the pain.
The media give us what we want.
Ive tried saying all this before, never gets through. Baldness doesnt go extinct though because
1) most men lock their women down early before it sets in
2) theres always an ugly woman too. dont forget that.
A preference that the man will never be able to change. Like "sucks that you're bald, now you'll never have me!" while there would have been no problem if the guy was NW1.
Remember that the vast majority think like that for no good reason, I explained it before, it's like the height factor, they say they want a tall guy because other girls say it all the time.
It's not a preference, it's hating, they want to put us down and make us feel bad, because we don't meet their collectively-fabricated criteria. Women and NW1 men get a kick out of it.
In the end, it's about power, men who don't have hair are inferior to the full heads. Women and NW1 will make sure to remind us of that fact whenever they get the chance.
Ive tried saying all this before, never gets through. Baldness doesnt go extinct though because
1) most men lock their women down early before it sets in
2) theres always an ugly woman too. dont forget that.
I agree with Fred. Those of you disagreeing do indeed make the valid point that aesthetically, baldness is a negative; what you are missing is that it is not that big of an aesthetic negative. In addition, there are other much larger factors at play which determine whether a man is "attractive" to women or not. Remember, women are not like men. Whether a man finds a woman attractive is almost exclusively determined by her appearance, it doesn't matter if she has no friends, or is an introvert, or if she living with her parents, or if she is poor, if she has no career ambitions, and so on. Not so for attractiveness of men to women.Yes, if redhead girls don't disgust you, then yes, it's just hating. You have no reason not to have a redhead girlfriend. That's what I mean, bald men are not disgusting, they do not repulse women. But women just hate them because society told them to do so. Yes bald men are less attractive, of course it's evolutionary, but my point is that baldness is not a deal-breaker. Women decided it was a deal-breaker under the pressure of society and Hollywood culture. That's why you see the "No bald men sorry" on dating websites. What's with those preferences anyway? Like us men are allowed to be picky. I maintain that baldness hate is nothing but a social construct, even if I know that Wolf Pack and swingline disagree with me on that.
I agree with Fred. Those of you disagreeing do indeed make the valid point that aesthetically, baldness is a negative; what you are missing is that it is not that big of an aesthetic negative. In addition, there are other much larger factors at play which determine whether a man is "attractive" to women or not. Remember, women are not like men. Whether a man finds a woman attractive is almost exclusively determined by her appearance, it doesn't matter if she has no friends, or is an introvert, or if she living with her parents, or if she is poor, if she has no career ambitions, and so on. Not so for attractiveness of men to women.
The cherry on top: it is allowed, even expected of leading men, to wear clothes which suit them. But not a wig (which is essentially a kind of clothing).