everysixseconds said:
no really twisted.
im sure the vast majority of men would prefer a gorgeous babe rather than an ugly one.
its just a fact that better looking people have genes that lend themselves to further proliferation. this is purely by virtue of the the fact that more attractive people are more desirable to the other sex, therefore the number if potnetial mates they can have is sky high.
Now, forgive me for skimming, because I don't actually care enough to read the entire article, or thread for that matter... but I don't really understand where 'being bald' and 'being doomed to f*****g ugly girls' coincide. I've gone out with PLENTY of so called 'gorgeous babes' over the course of the past couple years... and not a single one happens to mention the fact that I'm losing my hair. It's plain as day even with a no-guard buzz cut.
It's all in the presentation. If you make it clear that losing your hair doesn't bother you, then it doesn't mean a damn to women. They can smell insecurity quicker than that stinky concoction of spironolactone and minoxidil on your dome.
THIS IS THE REASON I ADVOCATE ACCEPTANCE OVER CURES!. If you accept the fact that you are losing your hair, then 99% of the damage is averted. The aesthetic property of having beautiful lockes is just that... aesthetics. A shelby cobra can look like sh*t on the outside and still blow the doors off of a brand new BMW. It's not the paint job that makes a car high performance you know... same thing with humans.
I, for one, would rather die than be impotent. Hair is expendible, losing your virility is losing your purpose for living (instinctually speaking). Stop reading what oprah has to say... God knows the b**ch doesn't have a leg to stand on in the sexual attraction discussions anyways.
And if f*****g ugly chicks is what you're doomed to do, by all means enjoy it. They need lovin' too... and NO ONE will judge you. No matter what color the exterior is, or how many rolls you gotta push out of the way to get to it, it's ALWAYS gonna be pink inside
. And if it isn't, Slip away!!! (parachutist's term for get the f*** out of dodge)
And that's the end of my lecture. There will be a test tomorrow.
Wait I lied. As a post script I'm gonna explain something about the whole "genetic proliferation" or whatever this guy said (wasn't really paying much attention). Humans have lost most of the hairs on their body, and what's left is greatly less dense than what we had millions of years ago. If I know anything about evolution, then I'm fairly sure that if an organ (and yes, hair is a part of the dermis organ (that's skin for you morons that don't know)) is useless, then it's either augmented, or completely phased out. Hair in humans have long since been about as beneficial as an a**h** on your elbow. Theoretically, we're still evolving, and I'm pretty sure the loss of hair on your head when you reach sexual maturity is just one step on the evolutionary ladder. The horseshoe pattern is probably just an anomaly that hasn't fully implemented itself along all the scalp hairs. Give it time though. The reason why we haven't seen any real changes in the pattern of male pattern baldness is because 10,000 or so years of human perception is a drop in the bucket in the grand scheme of things as far as nature is concerned. Give it another 100,000 years or so and I guarantee you that there will be a lot more bald guys running around, and probably women too once the gene can proliferate itself in women.
I guess it makes me happier to think that I might be more evolved than those monkeys with more hair than me
But that's just my theory, take it or leave it.
