blackg
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,723
It could be worse.Just noticed my number of posts and got a wave of shame in my stomach.
It could be worse.Just noticed my number of posts and got a wave of shame in my stomach.
The attractive phase of a man is also relatively short, not only for a woman:
View attachment 60437
View attachment 60438
And now:
View attachment 60439
I am afraid it is just you.Maybe its just me, but Will Windsor looks very good bald.
His grandfather was the same.
If he was a regular guy in London, with that look, and wearing designer suits,
I cannot imagine that he couldnt get hot dates.
View attachment 60452
Women didnt choose until recently.Hypergamy is a biological fact. I know people immediately think "money", but it's more than that. It's also genes, but money does play a part too. Women are the choosers. I can't say this often enough because bizarrely people seem to forget this fact.
Yeah, women earn more and more these days, but they still want to marry sideways or upwards in terms of status, money, looks.
Jordan Petson points this all out in 3 minutes:-
Female chimpanzees will mate with any male when she is on heat. However, the more dominant males tend to chase away the less dominant ones - that's evolution in progress.
For female humans, they choose. They choose. Can I say that again because it never seems to be clear to people that think men choose as much as women. No they don't . Women are the choosers. This is the case in almost every species divided into two sexes.
Women do not choose downwards.
Women choose sideways or upwards.
Always.
Always.
Always.
Hypergamy is a fact, and it is not associated only with money.
Women didnt choose until recently.
Biggest mistake of men.
Value is real and external and humans can almost always tell where value and power are. Height, physical fitness and looks are part of this: people high in these traits can more easily obtain what they want in life.
According to studies, on the job market, being good-looking (and smart enough, obviously) is the equivalent of having a master's degree.
NewsflashAs Peterson also pointed out, there is a 0.5 correlation between a man's success on the dating scene and his status.
It's not 0, and it will never be 0. Make no mistake, couples where the man makes less money will almost always experience issues.
Right now my girlfriend and I make the same, but if she starts making too much money compared to me, she'll come to resent me.
There's no escaping this and looks are often not enough to appease her, if you're the father of her kids, she'll want you to be above her in terms of status.
If that's not the case, her biology will take over and she'll (subconsciously) wonder how come that she's able to outperform you?
Value is real and external and humans can almost always tell where value and power are. Height, physical fitness and looks are part of this: people high in these traits can more easily obtain what they want in life.
According to studies, on the job market, being good-looking (and smart enough, obviously) is the equivalent of having a master's degree.
And women know this.
Seriously, comments like these are ridiculous.Newsflash
She already resents you if you are not making millions
She watches TV right
A woman almost always thinks they deserve everything
This is toxic hypergamy
Now I'm wondering if value is relative or absolute when it comes to looks or status.
And it would be interesting to see how women's perception has been distorted since the rise of globalism.
What about a hundred years ago? What if the best-looking person of your village was a 6/10, did he automatically become Chad in the eyes of the majority of the women of the village? What if better doesn't exist?
There are two schools here, and I've seen some people rate looks in absolute terms and others relative terms.
So many people have distorted perceptions and really think that the average man (or woman) is necessarily not overweight or having any physical impairments.
You only need to go outside to know that it's not true. The average person is a mess look-wise, which also explains women's harsh judgement that at least 80% of men are below average (ie. they don't make the cut).
Trying to assess this above.
I don't think what you say is true.
Only delusional women think like that.
People get matched according to looks, status, intelligence and personality traits.
Studies about this are quite clear.
It would not surprise me if some women devalued the men they know because they are not handsome and charismatic like David Beckham, so to speak.
Social media has made women think they deserve it all because of 5 these things:I think globalism has a role, but I am afraid it can't be assessed precisely.
More than one study has assessed, though, that the archetypal "Hollywood love story", in which man and wife behave for years as if they were on honeymoon, has set very high expectations, possibly too high expectations for the "real life couple".
It would not surprise me if some women devalued the men they know because they are not handsome and charismatic like David Beckham, so to speak.
that is true although conservative women are about 1% of total woman populationYou need to separate conservative and progressive females in your analysis.
I can't account for all different societies in a short post, writing "but, the amish women aren't hypergamous!" is counter productive. I'm talking about AVERAGE women from rich western countries, of course there are exceptions.*Puts his white knight helmet*
That's a gross generalization and you assume that all women are dysfunctional and delusional.
How do you explain that my current girlfriend doesn't do any of the above? And please don't tell me I found a unicorn.
Her female friends are the same, maybe unicorns flock together?
The only explanation I can find is that she is from a conservative background, same as her friends.
Flemish people in Belgium are very conservative and whoring around is definitely not the norm.
Do the above in Flanders and you're going to be ostracized.
That would be more common in the south of Belgium that is socialist, there the situation you describe above is way more common.
But even then, sl*t shaming there is powerful, women can't do that without consequences.
You need to separate conservative and progressive females in your analysis.
It's stupid to believe that society or a group within society is homogeneous.
When you do that, you're not so different from the leftists you despise so much.