blackg
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,723
Why can't this hypothetical illustrated man get laid? He's not bald.
Why can't this hypothetical illustrated man get laid? He's not bald.
Yeah, the blue-pilled naive thinker. Will never face the truth that it's all about looks. Humans would rather keep hope than facing the harsh truth. Having a hope that he'd get the chad's woman if he worked on his personality or attitude is hopeful because he can change these things. But facing the truth that it's all about looks and he can't do anything about it because the chad has it naturally, could be painful and shocking.
Can't really argue with that, because i have no experience in it to further the debate.I just want to add
Our brains release chemicals during sex
These chemicals can create bonding instincts or drive. In some more than others even to in some extremes obsessive men and women.
So it is easy to say what you would or would not feel for someone without these 'drugs' effecting your opinion.
I do think the ease of detachment that comes with high numbers and ease of sex weakens the power of these chemical changes in the brain.
It's like drug addicts rationalize sh*t to themselves to keep their drug.
Love and pleasure is kind of a drug.
Do you think that the main requirement to get laid is to have hair ? There are millions of full head virgins and also there're bald slayers, extremely rare, but they exist and usually they're gifted in everywhere, when it comes to their face or body or brain, so they can compensate very well.Why can't this hypothetical illustrated man get laid? He's not bald.
But why the hell do you guys all want "the chad's woman"?Yeah, the blue-pilled naive thinker. Will never face the truth that it's all about looks. Humans would rather keep hope than facing the harsh truth. Having a hope that he'd get the chad's woman if he worked on his personality or attitude is hopeful because he can change these things. But facing the truth that it's all about looks and he can't do anything about it because the chad has it naturally, could be painful and shocking.
Society wants men to be bluepilled. Facing the truth that no matter how hard you work you'll still be a second choice to a used up sl*t at best is demotivating. Society wants men to work hard, the men who work the hardest are the ones believing they will be rewarded at the end of all their work. The men who are benefiting society the most are often ugly outcasts devoting their time to their craft instead of partying it up with Stacy and Chad. These are the men paying for Stacy's benefits.Yeah, the blue-pilled naive thinker. Will never face the truth that it's all about looks. Humans would rather keep hope than facing the harsh truth. Having a hope that he'd get the chad's woman if he worked on his personality or attitude is hopeful because he can change these things. But facing the truth that it's all about looks and he can't do anything about it because the chad has it naturally can be painful and shocking.
All women are Chads women.But why the he'll do you guys all want "the chads woman"?
This is the problem here. Aren't you guys attracted to any girl below say, an 8?
The chad gets all the girls from 5 to 9. All the girls want the chad and that's the problem, they don't want looks match or average dudes.But why the he'll do you guys all want "the chads woman"?
This is the problem here. Aren't you guys attracted to any girl below say, an 8?
There is some truth in this, I believe.Society wants men to be bluepilled. Facing the truth that no matter how hard you work you'll still be a second choice to a used up sl*t at best is demotivating. Society wants men to work hard, the men who work the hardest are the ones believing they will be rewarded at the end of all their work. The men who are benefiting society the most are often ugly outcasts devoting their time to their craft instead of partying it up with Stacy and Chad. These are the men paying for Stacy's benefits.
I don't know if it's a bullshit conspiracy theory, but i think that the media is brainwashing women in the west to depopulate it. I don't know the real reason, but when you only have like 20%-30% of guys have access to sex and most of it is protective sex with no kids, with years, your population will decline drastically. 40 years ago that didn't happen, and that doesn't happen now in Asia or the middle east or Africa, only the west has this problem. I know it has an evolutionary aspect in it, but i feel like women use this as an excuse to continue being shallow. We're not living in the jungles anymore, we don't need to have ultra superior genetics to survive, our intelligence is already our best bet. Our strong jawlines or NW1 hair won't make us survive, but our intelligence and brain will and that's why we've been evolving them for hundreds of thousands of years. We only got this fair because of them. Please correct me if i'm wrong.Society wants men to be bluepilled. Facing the truth that no matter how hard you work you'll still be a second choice to a used up sl*t at best is demotivating. Society wants men to work hard, the men who work the hardest are the ones believing they will be rewarded at the end of all their work. The men who are benefiting society the most are often ugly outcasts devoting their time to their craft instead of partying it up with Stacy and Chad. These are the men paying for Stacy's benefits.
Can't really argue with that, because i have no experience in it to further the debate.
Well I think that problem goes both ways, to be honest.The chad gets all the girls from 5 to 9. All the girls want the chad and that's the problem, they don't want looks match or average dudes.
I don't know if it's a bullshit conspiracy theory, but i think that the media is brainwashing women in the west to depopulate it. I don't know the real reason, but when you only have like 20%-30% of guys have access to sex and most of it is protective sex with no kids, with years, your population will decline drastically. 40 years ago that didn't happen, and that doesn't happen now in Asia or the middle east or Africa, only the west has this problem. I know it has an evolutionary aspect in it, but i feel like women use this as an excuse to continue being shallow. We're not living in the jungles anymore, we don't need to have ultra superior genetics to survive, our intelligence is already our best bet. Our strong jawlines or NW1 hair won't make us survive, but our intelligence and brain will and that's why we've been evolving them for hundreds of thousands of years. We only got this fair because of them. Please correct me if i'm wrong.
The only question i haven't been able to answer yet, is that, does romantic love exist ? I know the normal love and attachment exist, but i'm not sure about romantic love. Without sex, no one would be interested in having a relationship. And we get into relationships based on looks and physical attraction alone. If the person lost that quality, most of us would be turned off. I feel like relationships are a trade, we trade women our looks and provide them money, and they offer us sex and kids, but i'm not really sure.I know
I was not saying it to be cruel
Even my own personal experience will be 'ugh how can she put up with 'that'
But truth is when you value someone in your life you put up with some sh*t.
And add sex to the mix--well it's hard parting with a great lover who is a complete sh*t in other ways.
You have to do it but it's hard.
It is easier as you get older though because you know that 'pang' is temporary and a broken heart won't actually kill you.
But when you are in 20? Holy sh*t it's like a knife in your heart. Like you can't breathe without feeling pain. So of course you try to reason and avoid that feeling.
I didn't say it's unfair, because no one owes anything to anybody. I'm not bitter and i said correct me if i'm wrong and it may just be bullshit theory, didn't say it's absolutely 100% right, because i can never be sure.It is not a conspiracy
Women today just have more options and independence so they are chooosing who and what they want.
Unfortunately some men are being left out of the mix.
Is it unfair? Probably but you are not bad looking you are just a little plain.
You CAN get a woman if you try.
But you are 17 and you are already bitter and I think perhaps your BDD and your social angst is giving yourself a locked in perspective before you even had a chance to 'start'
You are already rejecting yourself...why would a woman choose you?
We pick up on sh*t like this with one another.
Now this was really well said.It is not a conspiracy
Women today just have more options and independence so they are chooosing who and what they want.
Unfortunately some men are being left out of the mix.
Is it unfair? Probably but you are not bad looking you are just a little plain.
You CAN get a woman if you try.
But you are 17 and you are already bitter and I think perhaps your BDD and your social angst is giving yourself a locked in perspective before you even had a chance to 'start'
You are already rejecting yourself...why would a woman choose you?
We pick up on sh*t like this with one another.
No offence to @hairblues but I really don't need to have sex with her.
I like her, though. She's from Nu Yawk, baby!!
The frustrated men on here would want anything that's not too fat and not too ugly, simple as that.Well I think that problem goes both ways, to be honest.
How many of you frustrated men/boys want a looks-matched girl?
Come on, now. Be honest...
A few post back. One of the boys suggest that I am only agreeing with you so I could eventually spend three thousand Australian dollars on a return flight to New York, jump on the plane, have quick sex with you and then you drive me straight to JFK so I could be home in time for Australian Idol.Where did this come from?
I believe you, kind of.The frustrated men on here would want anything that's not too fat and not too ugly, simple as that.