philly said:I can't post the PDF. It is illegal. When you buy the stuff it says that it is for personal use only and that it should not be distributed under no circumstances whatsoever.
I have discontinued using the foam for some time now, yes. Never again will I put something that is so ineffective on my head.
philly said:Buy the study, read it, and you'll start laughing as hell. $30 isn't the end of the world.
philly said:beaner said:philly said:Buy the study, read it, and you'll start laughing as hell. $30 isn't the end of the world.
I don't need to read it. I've been using minoxidil for years and I know that the foam works better for me. I couldn't care less who else uses it, and I'm sure I speak for the many here that feel the same way.
Could you please stop posting useless trolls so we can keep this thread as clean as possible? Thanks.
philly said:beaner said:Well, he still hasn't posted the study so I'm convinced of nothing. Why don't you dig us up a "study" with the end results and not the 4 month mark, which we all know is no where near long enough to gauge the efficacy of a treatment? While you're at it, you need to find a comparable study with the liquid to prove your point.
Like, I said it works better for me as well as many others so I will continue to use the foam and grow hair regardless, and couldn't care less about this "study".
the results might have been around 20% better for the rogaine foam. This is certainly significant but does not in any way alter the conclusions that I have drawn in the first post of this thread.
philly said::freak: . 20% better than the foam results after 4 months of course. This is absolutely clear and evident. Liquid would still be more than 4 times more effective.
Please read my whole post before answering. Thanks.
philly said:"the results might have been around 20% better for the rogaine foam. This is certainly significant but does not in any way alter the conclusions that I have drawn in the first post of this thread"