Yahowha
Member
- Reaction score
- 0
Gardener, you're right about that. It was a bad statement on my part. Obviously we've done it before, but lying the country into war still isn't a good thing.
Odelay, I didn't say Bush was sitting around for 10 years waiting for the right moment to run for president so he could attack Iraq. It's just one of the many things Bush and the Neoconservatives wanted to do with their presidency. Don't believe me? Read any of the books put out by former administration members. Are they filp-flopping like Kerry because they used to say good things about the administration? (you're referring to the allegation that during his service in the Bush administration Richard Clarke said some good things about Bush) It really doesn't bother me that while he was working for Bush he said something good about Bush. He probably wanted to keep his job, he probably knew that what he had to say was going cause a stir and he wanted to keep it to himself until the right time. I don't understand why every statement someone made in the past has to agree with every statement they make in the present.
What I mean about the Kerry vote is that his vote wasn't going to sway the decision of Congress. Vote yes, the war happens. Vote no, the war still happens.
There's a difference between getting the same information as Bush, and having your information presented to you by Bush and his officials. Congress had the same information that Powell presented to the UN and the people of America and the world, information put together by the Bush administration. It's public information and is the same stuff that made anyone who supported the war support it in the first place. Bush is the president, he has direct access to all the nation's intelligence, and far more access than any member of congress. Kerry had to make a political gamble. He had to think "Is Bush right about all this? Is Saddam blatantly disregarding all UN sanctions because he has massive amounts of WMD. Is he going to attack America?" Kerry saw the same information as everyone else, and based on that information he had to vote yes. Well it turns out that Saddam didn't have that WMD, just like all the anti-war people and countries were saying from the beginning. I admit, Kerry was too stupid to realize that the anti-war people were right and the war would be a mistake. Hey he is sketchy but IMO he's a lesser evil. I'd vote Green if it wouldn't be a wasted vote and in reality a vote for Bush, since I would have voted for Kerry otherwise.
Hey, I'm sorry that my last post was badly put. I must have had too much of that dumbing Propecia before I wrote it.
I want you guys to know that if we disagree, I don't take it personally in any way and I hope you don't either. Free exchange of ideas and debate is what democracy is based on and it sucks when a good debate about stuff like this is taken personally. Also, this is obviously a hair loss talk site and not a political site, but political sites suck because it's all people from one party just agreeing with each other. Bringing this post back on topic about stem cells would make it even longer and it's wayy too long already.
Peace guys. :hairy:
Odelay, I didn't say Bush was sitting around for 10 years waiting for the right moment to run for president so he could attack Iraq. It's just one of the many things Bush and the Neoconservatives wanted to do with their presidency. Don't believe me? Read any of the books put out by former administration members. Are they filp-flopping like Kerry because they used to say good things about the administration? (you're referring to the allegation that during his service in the Bush administration Richard Clarke said some good things about Bush) It really doesn't bother me that while he was working for Bush he said something good about Bush. He probably wanted to keep his job, he probably knew that what he had to say was going cause a stir and he wanted to keep it to himself until the right time. I don't understand why every statement someone made in the past has to agree with every statement they make in the present.
What I mean about the Kerry vote is that his vote wasn't going to sway the decision of Congress. Vote yes, the war happens. Vote no, the war still happens.
odelay said:Congress was given the exact same information the president was basing his judgement to go to war on, they read that there was a threat in Iraq and they voted for the war there.
There's a difference between getting the same information as Bush, and having your information presented to you by Bush and his officials. Congress had the same information that Powell presented to the UN and the people of America and the world, information put together by the Bush administration. It's public information and is the same stuff that made anyone who supported the war support it in the first place. Bush is the president, he has direct access to all the nation's intelligence, and far more access than any member of congress. Kerry had to make a political gamble. He had to think "Is Bush right about all this? Is Saddam blatantly disregarding all UN sanctions because he has massive amounts of WMD. Is he going to attack America?" Kerry saw the same information as everyone else, and based on that information he had to vote yes. Well it turns out that Saddam didn't have that WMD, just like all the anti-war people and countries were saying from the beginning. I admit, Kerry was too stupid to realize that the anti-war people were right and the war would be a mistake. Hey he is sketchy but IMO he's a lesser evil. I'd vote Green if it wouldn't be a wasted vote and in reality a vote for Bush, since I would have voted for Kerry otherwise.
Hey, I'm sorry that my last post was badly put. I must have had too much of that dumbing Propecia before I wrote it.
I want you guys to know that if we disagree, I don't take it personally in any way and I hope you don't either. Free exchange of ideas and debate is what democracy is based on and it sucks when a good debate about stuff like this is taken personally. Also, this is obviously a hair loss talk site and not a political site, but political sites suck because it's all people from one party just agreeing with each other. Bringing this post back on topic about stem cells would make it even longer and it's wayy too long already.
Peace guys. :hairy: