Sugar and male pattern baldness
- Thread starter dpdr
- Start date
baldinglikeamofo
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 0
just make sure you burn it after you eat it and you'll be fine. Otherwise eat a real meal.
freakout
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 3
I had this desire to work with somebody to test this book's theory and make a small sample of people the book describes as being susceptible with their habits.
So I went looking for people who had a copy of the book. The first site I went to, thebaldtruth.com, banned me for merely posting the title with the question if anyone had a copy. I appeciated this site allowing me to do it.
The first few times I was here, finfighter accused me of spamming and promoting, propagating wild and wacky theories from a book he never read. And called me STUPID.
Now, how do I go about looking for people with the book with someone, who is a long time member, accusing me of spamming ?
And how do I make a sample of people without asking them to make public their daily routines which is not easy for most people. I did ask them publicly.
I thought it was just me who finfighter was treating with his behavior. Apparently, he was doing the same to others. cuebald called me a clown for asking for daily routines in another post.
If this forum shares information - and I did share a lot of what I've learned from the book without violating copyright - why are finfigter and cuebald being allowed treat forumers the way they do?
Sending PMs is bad while treating forumers like the way finfighter and cuebald does is ok?
I know finfigter was the one who reported me and he did this for putting up with his bad behavior. I don't mind being banned for putting up with people like him. He's the one promoting an illegal drug without asking if the person he was speaking with lived outside the US.
Well, I'm publicly reporting to you bad behavior. It forced me to resort to PM's which I thought would have been the right manner because then I wont be 'spamming the book'.
If fact, no one even PMed back their daily routines so I had to stop after just two attempts. You can browse my PMs. and review all my posts and see for yourself.
So I went looking for people who had a copy of the book. The first site I went to, thebaldtruth.com, banned me for merely posting the title with the question if anyone had a copy. I appeciated this site allowing me to do it.
The first few times I was here, finfighter accused me of spamming and promoting, propagating wild and wacky theories from a book he never read. And called me STUPID.
Now, how do I go about looking for people with the book with someone, who is a long time member, accusing me of spamming ?
And how do I make a sample of people without asking them to make public their daily routines which is not easy for most people. I did ask them publicly.
I thought it was just me who finfighter was treating with his behavior. Apparently, he was doing the same to others. cuebald called me a clown for asking for daily routines in another post.
If this forum shares information - and I did share a lot of what I've learned from the book without violating copyright - why are finfigter and cuebald being allowed treat forumers the way they do?
Sending PMs is bad while treating forumers like the way finfighter and cuebald does is ok?
I know finfigter was the one who reported me and he did this for putting up with his bad behavior. I don't mind being banned for putting up with people like him. He's the one promoting an illegal drug without asking if the person he was speaking with lived outside the US.
Well, I'm publicly reporting to you bad behavior. It forced me to resort to PM's which I thought would have been the right manner because then I wont be 'spamming the book'.
If fact, no one even PMed back their daily routines so I had to stop after just two attempts. You can browse my PMs. and review all my posts and see for yourself.
- Reaction score
- 42
freakout said:
Your first post in this thread said: "Part of my regimen causes slight increase in sugar metabolism in a steady manner. The purpose is to prevent wide fluctuations."
So are you talking about blood sugar, or are you talking about "moving about"? Or both? Or neither?
