BenVegas01
Member
- Reaction score
- 0
Bryan said:BenVegas01 said:The proven treatments for hairloss Minoxidil, dutasteride, ketoconazole, Finasteride - all show the % of active ingredient. Why should AHK-cu be any different?
I generally tend to agree with you on that, but for whatever reason(s), it's simply not the case in the Real World. Procyte certainly doesn't state the percentage of copper-peptide in Iamin Hydrating Gel, Dr. Pickart doesn't state how much copper-peptide is in his products like Folligen, and Dr. Proctor most certainly doesn't state how much of each ingredient is in Proxiphen (hell, he doesn't even state what all the ingredients actually are, much less how much of each one is included in the product). If even the FTC (not to mention the FDA) doesn't force product makers to tell how much of each ingredient is in the product (or what each ingredient actually is), it's obviously okay (and legal) for such information to be withheld from the consumer.
BenVegas01 said:It shows a contempt of the buyer, especially those who assumed they would be getting what had worked in the clinical trial ie: 2.5% AHK-cu
Again, I generally tend to agree with you, but I also acknowledge the fact that people like Dr. Proctor would probably be easily cheated by the "do-it-yourselfers" who would make cheap versions of things like Proxiphen, if they know exactly how much of each ingredient to use. I can appreciate knowing exactly what we're putting on our scalps, but I can also appreciate having a doctor protect the intellectual property that he has invested in all of his products.
Another issue that complicates what you said above about the "2.5% AHK-Cu peptide" in Tricomin has to do with the fact that the exact vehicle used in Tricomin is probably important. Procyte made improvements to the vehicle, allowing them to use a somewhat weaker peptide solution, saving us all money. I don't think it's completely fair for you to demand that we know exactly how much peptide is in the product, as if that's the sole basis on which to estimate its overall effectiveness, and decide whether or not to purchase Tricomin.
Thanks for the reply -
I would have thought that it would be the opposite. Users that don't know what they are getting are more likely to want to go the 'DIY' route - to ensure they are getting the real thing.
And i take your point about the vechile being important, but whatever the vechile used in the trials, should be the one sold, until more trials are done and published. After all, thats the only way they could know with certainty which vechile is best. As it was under patent, i can't see the underground market effecting mainstream sales.
I know many products don't adhere to this kind of transparancy, and it may be legal, but i think people need to reserve the right to be critical of these approaches that arn't transparent.
One of the big problems we have in hair loss treatments is that it takes at least 3 months, and perhaps up to 12 months to see results. For that reason i want as much certainty as possible about the treatments i am using. We are now at the point where the DIY route is becoming easier and safer thanks to some dedicated people on these forums.
Powersam - I'd love to see the full text also.