Who Would Help Fund A Kerastem Therapy?

parisienne

Established Member
Reaction score
69
And also, some people on these boards like you Hellouser really deserve to be thanked for sharing so much info, because if knowledge is power well now we're more powerful than 80% of the ****ing dermatologists from France.
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
A bunch of dead keratinized cells on top of my head has started determining my f*cking life.

LOL!

- - - Updated - - -

Two things:

1. We should first make sure that the Kerastem clinic we send someone to is doing the treatment correctly. It looks like the Swiss clinic is not doing it correctly.

2. We should send someone who is NW3 with thinning on top so that the person would have enough hair loss that he would be representative of most of us.
 

Bad_Wolve

Established Member
Reaction score
277
LOL!

- - - Updated - - -

Two things:

1. We should first make sure that the Kerastem clinic we send someone to is doing the treatment correctly. It looks like the Swiss clinic is not doing it correctly.

2. We should send someone who is NW3 with thinning on top so that the person would have enough hair loss that he would be representative of most of us.



i totally agree. i started this thread in the hope, that someone from here would be doing this treatment. it seems that the guy in switzerland does the original kerastem therapy. we have to figure that out. i saw on his webside, that he will give an speech about kerastem in the usa, i think in june.

the best man we could sent to switzerland would be of course hellouser. if he doesn´t want to, it would be also a pleasure for me. i lost so much money on hair loss treatments and if the users here would give me the chance to do it, i would try to get all the informations which the community wants to have. the doctor is from germany, this means that i could communicate well with him, because i am from austria. if we could collect 5000$ i would pay the rest by myself. i think i would be a good candidate for doing this, because i am an overall thinner.

just wanted you to offer that. if the community would be interested in sending me, i could post some pictures of my actual hair situation. i just want to make sure, that someone of us is going to do this quickly. furthermore i could offer you, that you chose someone of the communitiy here, which i would lay open my completely identity, including passports and phone number. so this user could prove that i am not standing in connection with someone from kerastem or beeing a swindler.

take your time and think about it.
 

Bad_Wolve

Established Member
Reaction score
277
Bad_Wolve, no matter what the guy in Switzerland says he is NOT doing the Kerastem treatment correctly. Period. We need to make him understand that we are not a bunch of rubes and that if he is selling us Kerastem then we expect to actually get Kerastem. He is not doing it. Even his own email to one of the posters proves that he is not doing Kerastem the exact way that he's supposed to do it.


i don´t have the scientific know how than you. someone should send that guy a mail and ask specific details. i just wanted to offer you my will to do it, if it is the original procedure.
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
A poster called Christopherher1 at HAIRSITE had the Kerastem treatment at Switzerland and the Swiss doctor did not follow the Kerastem treatment plan. We need to have a talk with the Swiss doctor to get him on the same
page as us so that the treatment is done correctly. They are supposed to do the following:

1. Get fat from the patient.

2. Extract adipose derived stem cells from the harvested fat.

3. Put the adipose derived stem cells into a very specific product called PUREGRAFT.

4. Then put the puregraft into the patient's scalp (after the adipose derived stem cells have been put into the puregraft).

That is not what he's doing. He is not using PUREGRAFT. He's using your own fat instead. Your own fat will migrate out of the injected area. They need to use PUREGRAFT.
But they're trying to cut corners.
 

Bad_Wolve

Established Member
Reaction score
277
this is how they are doing the phase2 trial:

Experimental: Fat + High Dose ADRC Kerastem Therapy includes micro-liposuction followed by subcutaneous scalp injection of purified adipose prepared with the Puregraft System + 1,000,000 ADRC prepared with the Celution System per square centimeter of scalp.

due to my worse english, i can´t identify the specific vocabularies in here. what is the difference by the trial and the version of the guy in switzerland?
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
Bad_Wolve,

I've explained it a lot of times. Pay attention. They're supposed to use a product called PUREGRAFT which is a special fat product. But they aren't using it. Instead they're using the patient's own fat. It's not the same thing. What is so hard to understand when I say they are supposed to use a product called PUREGRAFT but instead they use the patient's own fat? Here let me try it one more time:

1. They are supposed to use a product called PUREGRAFT.

2. They are not using the PUREGRAFT.

3. They are using the patient's own fat instead.
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
If PUREGRAFT is just a fat filtration system then all of my concern about PUREGRAFT being an actual product will confuse people so I'm going to start taking that information out of my recent posts.
 

hilbert

Established Member
Reaction score
150
They are supposed to extract fat from the patient and then extract adipose derived stem cells from the fat that they extracted from the patient.

That's all their supposed to do with the patient's fat. After they get the adipose derived stem cells from the patient's fat they're supposed to be done with the patient's fat.

Then they take the adipose derived stem cells that they got from the patient's fat and they're supposed to put those adipose derived stem cells inside of a product called PUREGRAFT.

What is so hard to understand about this? They are NEVER supposed to inject the patient's own fat back into his body. That is the problem. They're injecting the patient's own fat back into the patient
and they're NOT supposed to.

They're supposed to take the adipose derived stem cells from the patient's fat and then throw the rest of the patient's fat away...in the garbage. They have no use for what's left of the
patient's fat after they harvest the adipose derived stem cells from the patient's fat.

nameless, you know the stuff... pls contact the clinic and challenge them. on the one hand i'd find it strange they're certified by kerastem and they dont do it properly; on the other hand, it seems so...

guys, if we can sort this out, i'll surely put a treatment in geneve in my agenda anyway.
i want to test how it works in my native & thinning mid/vertex, and in some small thinning areas of my 10+ yo front transplant (due, it seems, to lack of stem cells... and kerastem sounds so appealing here).
 

Bad_Wolve

Established Member
Reaction score
277
Bad_Wolve,

I've explained it a lot of times. Pay attention. They're supposed to use a product called PUREGRAFT which is a special fat product. But they aren't using it. Instead they're using the patient's own fat. It's not the same thing. What is so hard to understand when I say they are supposed to use a product called PUREGRAFT but instead they use the patient's own fat? Here let me try it one more time:

1. They are supposed to use a product called PUREGRAFT.

2. They are not using the PUREGRAFT.

3. They are using the patient's own fat instead.

Do you understand yet? What is so hard about understanding this? They are using the patient's own fat instead of PUREGRAFT.




puregraft is in my oppinion a possibility do get your own fat clear. this means the guy in switzerland has to use the patient´s own fat. puregraft is in my oppinion just a way to filter other indegrients out of the fat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnEjJk1ysjo

hope that i am not making you angry again. :newbie:
 

hellouser

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,634
Just to get everyone up to speed on Kerastem:

My meeting with Dr. Ken Washenik was delayed and unfortunately both of us had to quickly attend another presentation shortly after. We segwayed during our converation, badly, lol. But that's not to say I didn't get any information from Dr. Washenik. What happened was that we first talked about our upbringing and history with hair loss, we talked about what we use, and I mentioned some of the experimentals I'm on. This topic actually lasted a while. Due to this and the short amount of time until the next presentation that day, I wasn't able to cover a lot of ground.

I did take notes, but because the conversation was relatively short in regards to kerastem, I didn't have many, AND because we sorta rushed the last bit about kerastem, I couldnt keep up with note talking, questions AND answers. So, they were limited. Cherry on top: I LOST MY NOTES!

But, he did mention Kerastem is already available (I'm pretty sure). He mentioned ARI is up for sale (afaik, Aderans owned ARI) and mentioned the IP is cheap but running further trials would be expensive. So, it's not like the tech is completely finished.

After that, he mentioned he's on the board of directors (I think) at Follica and, like Dr. Cotsarelis, couldn't comment on development of Follica.

In regards to Kerastem, here's some extra info:

They're doing the procedure in Japan and Switzerland now. Spain will be available in shortly. So it's commercially available now.

I'm not sure if it's IIa or IIb. The initial test, as mentioned on kerastem.com, sites a 6 user trial with 100% response rate. I believe there is a 21 person trial in the UK and Japan ('results support the safety and feasibility of the procedure'), which suggests this current test is IIb.

There are two parts to the Kerastem procedure. 1. Injection of fat cells 2. Injection of ADRCs (adipose derived regenerative cells). The ADRCs are prepared from the same fat cells using a proprietary, trademarked method that Kerastem calls 'Celution'. These cells trigger protein pathways and hormonal behaviour. The two steps are both equally important, working in conjunction 50/50.

Normally, an autologous procedure (moving something from your own body back into your own body) is not that heavily regulated since the risks are minimum. However, since the 'Celution' method of prepping the ADRC's purifies the cells, the FDA has decided they are no longer 'autologous' since the cells have changed. Kerastem has to jump through a ton of hoops in the US because of this.

No word on when commercially available in the US. All data should be gathered by Spring of 2017, since the trial goes for a year. At that point they'll jump into phase III, which means more time. However, they will have published a ton more data on their procedure, allowing us to make a more educated decision on whether or not we all want to fly to Japan or Switzerland and spend money.

Many thanks to Dr. Ken Washenik for taking time out of his schedule to meet with me, as well as Dr. Eric Daniels for setting up our meeting!

Source:
http://www.gourmetstylewellness.com/interact/showthread.php/96832-Kerastem-Interview-w-Dr-Ken-Washenik
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
I was under the misguided impression that PUREGRAFT was a synthetic fat product. I stand corrected. How embarrassing. I'm sorry Bad_Wolve.
 

hilbert

Established Member
Reaction score
150
I have already used the Swiss clinic's contact form to try to contact them. I'm waiting for a response. I've sent emails to USA Kerastem researchers and to Cytori. Cytori is the company behind Kerastem. I have not heard back from anyone yet. Keep in mind that I only speak English. I have tomorrow off and I will try calling some of these people tomorrow.

ok thanks, perfect.
they replied to me at the beginning of their business hours.
it's 3 am in this time zone, so in 5-6 hours you'll get a reply.
my (late) suggestion: be generic in the contact form, then ask it straight once you've opened the channel.
 

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
ok thanks, perfect.
they replied to me at the beginning of their business hours.
it's 3 am in this time zone, so in 5-6 hours you'll get a reply.
my (late) suggestion: be generic in the contact form, then ask it straight once you've opened the channel.

That's what I did. In the contact form I just put that I wanted to know about Kerastem. I didn't mention anything about questioning whether or not they were following the protocol. When they respond I will ask them about their protocol and then go through it with a fine tooth comb.
 

Bad_Wolve

Established Member
Reaction score
277
no need to worry bro. i don´t want to ask dumb questions. i was just wondered, because if puregraft would have been really a synthetic fat, it would become dangerous when the body repels it.
 

hilbert

Established Member
Reaction score
150
That's what I did. In the contact form I just put that I wanted to know about Kerastem. I didn't mention anything about questioning whether or not they were following the protocol. When they respond I will ask them about their protocol and then go through it with a fine tooth comb.

thanks so much. we need to dig into this, it looks a promising interlude to replicel/histogen.
i'm also waiting for replies to some further questions i put today; will post as soon as i get them.
 
Top